Insights · For the Bench & Bar

On technical neutrals, discovery, and the modern record.

Practical writing for judges, clerks, and litigators researching when and how to engage a court-appointed technical special master, discovery referee, or forensic neutral.

  1. 01January 14, 20265 min read

    When Should a Court Appoint a Technical Special Master?

    Rule 53 gives courts the authority to refer technical disputes to a neutral. The harder question is when an appointment is warranted. Five recurring signals tell the bench it is time.

    Read the piece →
  2. 02February 25, 20265 min read

    Technical Special Masters and AI: Resolving Algorithmic and Source-Code Disputes

    Machine-learning systems break the assumptions behind ordinary discovery. A technical special master gives courts a way to examine models, training data, and outputs that the rules were not built to reach.

    Read the piece →
  3. 03March 30, 20265 min read

    Discovery Referee vs. Forensic Neutral vs. Special Master: What's the Difference?

    The three titles are used loosely and often interchangeably, but they carry different authority and arise from different sources. Knowing which role the case needs sharpens the appointing order.

    Read the piece →
  4. 04April 28, 20266 min read

    What to Include in a Technical Special Master Appointment Order

    A technical special master can only do what the order authorizes. A precise appointment order prevents scope fights, protects sensitive material, and tells everyone how the master’s findings will be reviewed.

    Read the piece →

Inquiries from the Court & Counsel

Weighing an appointment in a technical matter?

Conflicts checks, availability, and proposed terms of reference are handled discreetly and without obligation.